Dr. Oz Endorses GMO Labeling; UC Davis Scientists Funded by Biotech

by Ann Marie Michaels on October 18, 2012

Print Friendly

Join me at the Take Back Your Health Conference April 18-20, 2015 in Los Angeles. Dr. Cate Shanahan, Mark McAfee and many more speakers. I hope to see you there! Click here to order tickets

Dr. Oz Endorses GMO Labeling

Dr. Oz Endorses GMO Labeling

Should GMO foods be labeled? Dr. Oz says yes.

“Right now we have no way of knowing which foods have been genetically modified. I believe you should have that right,” said Dr. Oz, at the conclusion of the segment, titled GMO Foods: Are They Dangerous to Your Health? “I prefer to be cautious.” (Source: Sacramento Bee)

This November, for the first time in America, California’s Proposition 37 will allow the people to vote on whether or not foods should be labeled as genetically modified (GMOs).

An online poll of Oz viewers revealed that 91% of Dr. Oz fans would prefer non-GMO foods if given the choice.

Dr. Oz said that there are no long-term studies that have been done on the effects of GMO foods on humans, and therefore, he recommends that we avoid GMOs.

Oz said that if we want to be safe, we should go organic.

He told viewers to look for the following seals on food labels:

USDA Organic Seal

Non-GMO Project Seal

Dr. Oz said that if your food is not labeled “organic,” you should avoid buying food from the following five crops: canola, corn, papaya, soy, and sugar beets.

Watch the Video

UC Davis Scientists Funded by Biotech

Dr. Oz had two scientists from UC Davis on his show. Martina Newell-McGloughlin, Director of Life and Health Sciences Research at UC Davis Office of Research and Alison L. Van Eenennaam, Ph.D.

OK, so let’s ask this question. Who funds UC Davis?

You guessed it. Biotech firms including Syngenta, Dupont and Monsanto.

The same chemical corporations who donated over $30 million to the No on Prop 37 campaign, money that is being used to blanket California TV with anti-Prop 37 ads to the tune of over $1 million per day.

Dr. Oz Endorses GMO Labeling

Click here to download Monsanto’s letter to UC Davis and other documents.

According to the Sacramento Bee:

A “who’s who” of international biotechnology companies fund work at UC Davis. They include Monsanto, Syngenta, DuPont and Bayer. Some grants pay for specific research, but many arrive with no official strings attached. Whatever the form, the companies get something in return – access to the university’s talent pool and, often, first crack at its scientific breakthroughs.

“The public is having a hard time figuring out where the corporate door ends and where the university door begins,” said Bill Liebhardt, former director of the UC system’s sustainable farming program, which promotes nonindustrial farming methods.

Small farmers — the very people agricultural colleges like UC Davis were established to help — feel neglected. “The university is being led by industry,” said Judith Redmond, co-owner of Full Belly Farm, an organic vegetable farm in Yolo County. (Source: Sacramento Bee)

What About the Cost of GMO Labeling to Consumers?

Gary Hirshberg, former CEO of Stonyfield Yogurt, was also on the show. Hirshberg says that the No on 37 argument that labeling will put a financial burden on consumers is a “diversionary tactic”.

Hirshberg calls it a non-issue, quoting an Emory University Study (download it here) that shows that labeling GMOs would cost consumers less than $1 per year per person.

Assuming that all producers pass on the entire one -­‐ time expense of redesigning labels, average prices in these food categories would increase by 0.03% in order to offset the average one-­‐time expense of redesigning labels of $1,104.43. If prices increased by 0.03%, California household expenditure for these food categories would only increase by 67 cents ($2,237*0.0003). (Source: Emory University — read more here)

Dr. Oz Endorses GMO Labeling

Do You Think We Should Label GMOs?

What do you think? Should GMOs be labeled, yes or no?

Do you eat organic and avoid GMOs, as Dr. Oz recommends?

Please share your thoughts in the comments below.

If you agree that we should label GMOs, please share this post on Facebook and Pinterest, and tell your friends and family in California to vote YES on Prop 37!

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

PAID ENDORSEMENT DISCLOSURE: In order for me to support my blogging activities, I may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for my endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog.

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

Andy October 18, 2012 at 2:13 PM

How immature. They had to leave the stage? Really?

And selective breeding does not equal GMO


cheeseslave October 18, 2012 at 3:14 PM

@Andy I thought the exact same thing on both counts!


JasonM October 18, 2012 at 2:32 PM

I like Mercola a million times more than Oz but I do give Oz a lot of credit for coming out and supporting GMO labeling.


cheeseslave October 18, 2012 at 2:58 PM

I give Oz major props! It’s not easy doing something like that on national TV.

Also I was impressed to find out that Dr. Oz’s wife, Lisa, did the narration on Jeffrey’s Smith’s film, Genetic Roulette. VERY cool!


Tiffany @ The Coconut Mama October 18, 2012 at 3:30 PM

Wow, go Dr.Oz! People listen to him. This is wonderful for Yes on Prop 37!


Joy October 19, 2012 at 5:50 AM

of course i want my food labeled. well, i live in the philippines but i am american so when i return i want to know. if GM foods are banned in so many countries there is clearly enough evidence or questions that they are unsafe. why shouldn’t we be informed?

question – what foods contain sugar beets? i already avoid corn, soy, papaya and canola.


cheeseslave October 19, 2012 at 8:36 AM


It’s a new scheme here in the states. They’re taking high fructose corn syrup out of foods (ketchup, soft drinks, etc.) and now saying they are using just sugar. The only problem is it’s GM beet sugar.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.


Get High-School Skinny Now! May 22, 2013 at 12:09 PM

What a data of un-ambiguity and preserveness of precious knowledge regarding unpredicted feelings.


Leilani S. Platner October 2, 2014 at 3:22 PM

You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter
to be actually something which I think I would never understand.
It seems too complex and extremely broad for me.

I am looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the
hang of it!


Twanna O. Egizi October 5, 2014 at 10:57 AM

This paragraph will help the internet viewers for building up new web site
or even a weblog from start to end.


Vera P. Ducasse October 5, 2014 at 7:39 PM

I was curious if you ever considered changing the structure of
your site? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
But maybe you could a little more in the way
of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having
1 or 2 images. Maybe you could space it out better?


Chantal W. Shin October 5, 2014 at 8:46 PM

Hello every one, here every one is sharing such knowledge, so
it’s nice to read this web site, and I used to pay a quick visit this website everyday.


Cathy O. Henderlite October 6, 2014 at 8:24 AM

Hi, i feel that i saw you visited my weblog thus i
came to go back the desire?.I am attempting to to find issues to enhance my website!I suppose
its good enough to make use of some of your ideas!!


Madelene B. Dwelley October 7, 2014 at 8:50 PM

I’ll right away seize your rss as I can’t find
your email subscription hyperlink or newsletter service.
Do you have any? Please let me understand so that I could subscribe.


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: