Prop 37 on California Ballot: Vote Yes to Label GMOs

by Ann Marie Michaels on August 22, 2012

Print Friendly

proposition 37

I’m thrilled that Prop 37 is on the California Ballot this November. Because I’m voting yes. And if you’re in California, you should vote YES, too.

If you’re not in California, you need to do everything you can to help spread the word. Because this affects all Americans.

If food manufacturers are forced to label GMOs in California, they’re not going to make special labels for one state — they’re going to have to label GMOs nationwide.

This is the biggest food fight of our lives, and we are going to need to pull out all the stops.

Why Vote Yes on Prop 37

Voting YES on Prop 37 means that genetically engineered foods (GMOs) will have to be labeled in the state of California.

Voting NO on Prop 37 means that no labeling of GMOs would be required.

I don’t like the idea of eating pesticides. I go out of my way to buy organic.

Especially when those carcinogenic pesticides are embedded within the foods themselves. It’s one thing to spray pesticides on crops — it’s something else to engineer seeds that have the pesticides built right in.

Cancer, anyone?

Arguments for Prop 37

People who oppose Prop 37 (Monsanto, et al) say it’s going to cost too much to label foods.

They say:

Prop 37: Means Higher Food Costs
Prop 37 would force farmers and food companies to implement costly new labeling, packaging, distribution and record keeping operations or switch to higher-priced, non-GE ingredients,
like organics, in order to sell food in California. Economic studies show this would increase food costs for an average California family by hundreds of dollars per year – a HIDDEN FOOD TAX that would especially hurt seniors and low-income families who can least afford it. (Source: No on Prop 37)

Here’s my response:

Increase food costs by hundreds of dollars per year? How much is a human life worth? Would you rather pay a little extra now and save the lives of your loved ones?

The Cost of Cancer
The cost of cancer in the year 2020 is projected to reach at least $158 billion (in 2010 dollars). Assuming a 2 percent annual increase in medical costs in the initial and final phases of care, the projected 2020 costs increase to $173 billion. Estimating a 5 percent annual increase in these costs raises the projection to $207 billion. These figures do not include other types of costs, such as lost productivity, which add to the overall financial burden of cancer. (Source: Cancer.gov

Proposition 37

proposition 37 opponents

Follow the Money

This is a battle of the chemical companies against the people, plain and simple. Multinational corporations including Monsanto, Dupont, Dow, Syngenta have raised over $25 million so far to fight Prop 37.

If GMO foods really are safe, why are these chemical companies shelling out so much money to make sure these GMO foods don’t get labeled?

prop 37

Help Get the Word Out

Please help us spread the word! Please share this post on Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest.

Tell your friends and family in California to get out and vote YES on Prop 37.

Like These Facebook Pages

Like the following Facebook pages and share their posts on your wall:

https://www.facebook.com/carighttoknow
https://www.facebook.com/organicconsumers
https://www.facebook.com/responsibletechnology
https://www.facebook.com/millionsagainst
https://www.facebook.com/justlabelit
https://www.facebook.com/LabelGMOsHollywood
https://www.facebook.com/occupymonsanto
https://www.facebook.com/nongmoproject

Share Your Thoughts Below

Do you want to see GMOs labeled? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Photo credit: http://www.kcet.org/news/ballotbrief/elections2012/propositions/prop-37-funding-genetically-engineered-food.html

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...PAID ENDORSEMENT DISCLOSURE: In order for me to support my blogging activities, I may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for my endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog.

AMAZON DISCLOSURE: The owner of this website is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon properties including, but not limited to, amazon.com, endless.com, myhabit.com, smallparts.com, or amazonwireless.com.

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

cindy August 22, 2012 at 6:45 AM

Even though I am European, I would encourage Americans to vote YES to Prop 37. Then perhaps GMOs would STOP lobbying in EU.

I lived in the US for 14 years. And I am the kind of person who seldom eat out, who stop using MSG since 1975, 99.9% no canned or frozen food, eat healthy (not fanatically), no cancer hisotry in the family, yet I contacted cancer. I always, and will always, claimed my cancer has something to do with the food I eat. In particularly while I was in the US.

SO, please vote YES to stop GMO. We do not need GMO no matter how all the seemingly good reasons they are giving us. And I do not believe the cost associates with labelling. IF THEY STOP MANIPULATING our food, they DO NOT HAVE TO label anything to start with! What nonsense.

Reply

Linda August 22, 2012 at 11:50 AM

I am with you on this.

Reply

Robin @ Thank Your Body August 22, 2012 at 12:57 PM

So wish I lived in California JUST so I could vote on this. I’m still doing my best to get the word out.

Reply

Tiffany @ The Coconut Mama August 22, 2012 at 2:46 PM

Wish I lived in Cali so I could vote on this :(

Reply

Leah August 25, 2012 at 8:07 PM

So glad to hear this made it on the ballot. I signed a petition outside my health food store but never heard if it made it. I will definitely be voting yes on 37.

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: