Save Drakes Bay Oyster Farm

by Ann Marie Michaels on November 27, 2011

Print Friendly

Oyster

As many of you know, small, sustainable farms are under attack in America and around the world. Oyster farms are no exception. I’ve been reading about the dirty politics surrounding Drakes Bay Oyster Farm and my blood is boiling.

The National Park Service wants to shut them down, and for no good reason. Who knows why they are pushing for this (I smell something very fishy). Bottom line: their claims that the oyster farm is bad for the environment are TOTALLY bogus.

The Attack on Drakes Bay Oyster Farm

The National Park Service plans to shut down Drakes Bay Oyster Farm in 2012. According to The Oyster Guide:

The ecological footprint is tiny, and there’s probably no other farm of any kind in the country producing so much high-quality, ultra-nutritious protein so efficiently. Kevin explained to me that the amount of organic meat that can be produced per acre on the oyster farm is many times what can be produced on an organic cattle farm (which he also owns). Kevin is even working to restore to the estuary two native, threatened shellfish species: the Olympia Oyster and the Purple-Fringed Rock Scallop. Yet the Park Service has decided that a working oyster farm, even one that is the paragon of sustainable agriculture, doesn’t fit with their vision of what a national park should include.

Drakes Bay

Drakes Bay

But Isn’t Farmed Fish Bad?

While most kinds of “farmed” fish should be avoided, sustainably farmed shellfish (oysters, clams and mussels) are very good for you and are very important to the environment. Just like we promote grass-fed meat for the health benefits and for the environment, oysters are highly regarded for both reasons.

Drakes Bay Oyster Farm, established in the 1950s, is one of the last sustainable oyster farms in California. They have the very last cannery in the state.

Remember John Steinbeck’s classic novel, Cannery Row? There used to be a lot of canneries along the California coast. Now there is exactly ONE left — at Drakes Bay.

Why the Argument for Humanless Landscapes is Bull Crap

The Natural Park Service wants the land to go back to its “natural state”. As we know from sustainable grass farmers like Joel Salatin, the theory that the “humanless landscape” is best for our environment is total bull crap.

In fact, bull crap is exactly what is needed in order to build topsoil and revive our grasslands.

Lierre Keith, author of The Vegetarian Myth, makes the point that animals on pasture produce FAR more topsoil than “humanless landscapes”. A “humanless” pine forest produces only one-sixteenth of an inch of soil in 50 fifty years. Meanwhile, Joel Salatin’s farm is building one inch of topsoil annually.

Keith writes:

On Joel Salatin’s Polyface Farm — the mecca of sustainable food production — organic matter has increased from 1.5 percent in 1961 to 8 percent today. The average right now in the US is 2-3 percent.

In case you don’t understand, let me explain. A 6.5 percent increase in organic matter isn’t a fact for ink and paper: it’s a song for the angels to sing.

Remember that pine forest that built one-sixteenth of an inch of soil in fifty years? Cue those angels again: Salatin’s rotating mixture of animals on pasture is building one inch of top soil annually.

So it isn’t “wilderness” that we need. It’s sustainable farms.

Why We Must Save the Oysters

According to Mark Kurlansky, author of one of my favorite books, The Big Oyster: History on the Half Shell:

[Oysters] suck in the water and take out algae and impurities and pump out clear water. So that when Henry Hudson first arrived in New York Harbor, the water must have been incredibly clear because of all those oysters. (Source)

Time Magazine reports:

According to a study published in the February issue of BioScience, 85% percent of the world’s native oyster reefs have been destroyed. Three-quarters of the wild oysters left in the world, the study says, now live in North America —- and they aren’t all doing that great, either.

Oysters aren’t delicate creatures. In fact, you have to go out of your way to make life difficult for these animals, which happen to be the most efficient water filters in the world. For centuries, they kept the English Channel from choking itself on sewage and industrial sludge; a few beds can clean the entire New York City harbor in a matter of months, according to Mark Kurlansky’s admirable book, The Big Oyster. In it, he notes that the creatures just a hundred years ago were so common and copious that you could buy a big jar of them, shelled, for a quarter. The indigenous peoples of Manhattan ate so many oysters that the leftover shells formed mountains that could be used as landmarks. More recently, their shells have been turned into calcium supplements and construction materials. But alas, out of pure shortsightedness, these incredibly beneficial animals have been driven to functional extinction.

So WHY would we want to get rid of them? Shut down the oyster farm and the oysters will continue to reproduce, but at a MUCH slower rate than they will if we allow the oyster farm to stay in business.

Bottom line: Oysters are being wiped off the face of the earth AND they are capable of very effectively cleaning and filtering the oceans, just as grazing animals help to produce topsoil. We need MORE sustainable oyster farms, not fewer.

Who’s Behind The Attack on Drakes Bay Oysters?

The push to close Drakes Bay Oyster Farm is being fueled by the likes of the Sierra Club, Rainforest Action Network, National Parks Conservation Association, National Wildlife Federation. They have formed a coalition with a website teeming with unsupported claims and logical fallacies:

If we lose the wilderness status at Drakes Estero, it opens the door for industry to do the same in our wilderness areas and national parks across the country. (Source: Save Point Reyes Wilderness)

Um, hi? That’s a classic logical fallacy: Slippery Slope.

I could go on and rip apart all the fallacious claims on their website but I’ll stop here. I want to get this post up so you guys have time to do something to help save this small family farm (scroll down to the bottom for the post for how you can help).

Drakes Bay Oysters

So What Are the Claims?

Here is what they are claiming:

1. Oyster farming is harming Harbor Seals.
2. Oyster farming is harming eel grass or causing increased sedimentation in Drakes Estero.
3. Oysters threaten native species:

Let’s take a look at these false claims, all of which have been soundly disproven by the National Park Service’s very own data:

1. Oyster farming is NOT harming Harbor Seals.

Dr. Corey Goodman shows that the seals are being harmed by kayakers, not the oyster farm boats. These photographs come from the National Park Service — 3 1/2 years worth of photographs that clearly show that there has not been a single disturbance by the oyster farm.

Read the full analysis of the National Park Service’s Data by Dr. Corey Goodman.

Watch Dr. Corey Goodman’s video proving that the seals are not being harmed:

2. Oyster farming is NOT harming eel grass or causing increased sedimentation in Drakes Estero.

Report 1 to Marin County Board of Supervisors
Cover letter for Report 2 to Marin County Board of Supervisors
Report 2 to Marin County Board of Supervisors

3. Oysters do NOT threaten native species.

According to the Alliance for Local Sustainable Agriculture:

Historically and currently, the shellfish species produced within this lease include Pacific Oysters, Kumamoto Oysters, Manila Clams and Purple Hinged Rock Scallops. These products continue to be produced as “singles” and sold live in-shell as well as shucked packed in various sized containers. The water temperature of Drakes Estero remains too cold for the non-native oysters to reproduce, therefore they are not able to escape into the natural habitat.

The Drakes Bay Oyster Farm produces its own shellfish seed (baby shellfish) by performing remote setting on-farm, which mean no “hitchhiker” organisms or diseases are introduced from elsewhere.

Oysters = Good Water Quality

Folks, oysters are CRITICAL to the health of our oceans.

A single oyster is capable of filtering over fifty gallons of water per day. Scientists have shown that the shellfish aquaculture in Drakes Estero improves both species richness and abundance in Drakes Estero.

For this reason, the California State Legislation reads:

WATER CODE SECTION 14950-14958

14950. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Shellfish Protection Act of 1993.

14951. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

(a) Commercial shellfish harvesting is a beneficial use of the waters of the state and, in addition, benefits the economy of the state through the creation of jobs.
(b) Pollution, from both point and nonpoint sources, currently threatens many of the state’s commercial shellfish growing areas.
(c) In order to maintain the health, and encourage the expansion, of commercial shellfish harvesting within the state, it is necessary to protect the commercial shellfish growing areas from ongoing point and nonpoint sources of pollution.
(d) The regional boards whose jurisdictions include commercial shellfish growing areas shall have primary responsibility for the protection of commercial shellfish harvesting from the effects of point and nonpoint pollution sources.

Drakes Bay Oysters

Nancy Lunny of Drakes Bay Oyster Co. at Weston A. Price Foundation Wise Traditions 2008

How You Can Help Save Drakes Bay Oyster Farm

Please take 5 minutes and submit a comment on the Draft EIS.

The deadline is Friday, December 9th. Please act NOW!

Tell them that you SUPPORT Drakes Bay Oyster Company and you believe that sustainably farmed oysters IMPROVE the environment and do not harm it in any way.

The action you take can help to keep this family farm alive. Please just click over and tell them that you Drakes Bay Oyster Farm is good for the environment and demand that they let them stay open.

Remember, the National Park Service works for US, the American people.

If you are a member of the Sierra Club, Rainforest Action Network, National Parks Conservation Association, National Wildlife Federation or any of the organizations listed on this page, I implore you to STOP giving these people your hard-earned money. They are spreading lies about a sustainable farm and this should not be supported.

Photo credits: Oyster by Swamibu, on Flickr and Drakes Bay by jdlasica
Disclosure: cmp.ly/4 and cmp.ly/5

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...PAID ENDORSEMENT DISCLOSURE: In order for me to support my blogging activities, I may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for my endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog.

AMAZON DISCLOSURE: The owner of this website is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon properties including, but not limited to, amazon.com, endless.com, myhabit.com, smallparts.com, or amazonwireless.com.

{ 22 comments… read them below or add one }

Sophie November 27, 2011 at 11:44 AM

I did it, but somehow it doesn’t seem like enough.

Comment ID: 696608-43390/44507

It’s a shame that the Sierra Club, the Rainforest Action Network, the National Parks Conservation Association, or the National Wildlife Federation seem to have a knee-jerk response to things.

Reply

Anna November 27, 2011 at 11:45 AM

done and done!

Reply

Josefina November 27, 2011 at 12:04 PM

Terrible. I don’t have faith in conservation groups at all, with their dubious origins and affiliations, so their support of the shut down comes as a no surprise unfortunately.

Reply

Paula November 27, 2011 at 12:08 PM

This is one of the reasons I refuse to purchase foods or clothing that are sold to support saving rain forests and other landscapes.
They are anti sustainability on all levels, and that includes regulated hunting and things like the oyster farm as you have shared.

Reply

Lena November 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM

Ann Marie, have you heard of the documentary A Sea Change?

http://www.aseachange.net/about.htm

http://www.aseachange.net/

The topic could also be used in your argument’s favor, since sustainable oyster farming would help oysters and other shellfish flourish as opposed to having their shells disintegrate due to ocean acidification.

Reply

Kristi November 27, 2011 at 1:25 PM

When I first started reading about this stuff I first thought it was very far fetched. But now, I guess I’m one of the crazies, too. Have you read about it? Here’s one. http://ppjg.wordpress.com/2011/11/19/h-r-3432-and-now-they-come-for-the-cows/

Reply

Allison November 27, 2011 at 1:54 PM

I submitted the comment! This makes my blood boil as well!

Reply

Monica November 27, 2011 at 2:22 PM

Just submitted my comment!! I copied and pasted some of your awesome info. :-)
Dear Sir or Madam,

I would like to voice my support for Drakes Bay Oyster Company, as I firmly believe that sustainably farmed oysters improve the environment and do not harm it in any way. The water temperature of Drakes Estero remains too cold for the non-native oysters to reproduce; therefore they are not able to escape into the natural habitat.

The Drakes Bay Oyster Farm produces its own shellfish seed (baby shellfish) by performing remote setting on-farm, which mean no “hitchhiker” organisms or diseases are introduced from elsewhere.

Please keep this family farm alive and let them stay open! They are doing both the environment and us the consumers a service.

Sincerely,
Monica Jun

Reply

hal | www.questorganic.com November 27, 2011 at 4:22 PM

Environmentalists suffer from a very narrow conception of how to support the environment, and often overlap quite a bit with the vegan population. A healthy farm helps complete the cycle of bringing nutrients back to the land, like Joel Salatin’s Polyface Farm. You have my support on many levels

http:www.questorganic.com

Reply

Alison November 27, 2011 at 5:42 PM

Joel Salatin for president!! I submitted my comment. P.S. Can you do a giveaway of his new book? It is such great reading material, I want to tell all my friends about it!

Reply

cheeseslave November 27, 2011 at 9:29 PM

Sure!

Reply

Al Williams November 27, 2011 at 7:37 PM

I have been eating oysters for the last 30 years. Back when I started, oysters were cheap and easy to come by. Over the years the popularity of oysters has increased substantially (based on my own experience) and with the increase in demand has come an increase in price. Today, where I live (Central Oregon) oyster in the shell run $.99 cents. They were $.22 cents when I started eating oysters. The last thing we need now is to decrease the supply by closing down oyster farms. The National Park Service needs to keep their noses out of our oyster farms and in the Parks we have entrusted them to manage. I will post my comments on the Draft EIS as well…..

Reply

Al Williams November 27, 2011 at 7:46 PM

Comment ID: 697592-43390/45485

Reply

Susan November 28, 2011 at 10:00 AM

Done!

Reply

cheeseslave November 28, 2011 at 10:38 AM

Thanks everyone for leaving comments! You are making a difference!

Reply

torea November 28, 2011 at 3:02 PM

Hey, the link to your PDF referenced in item 1. is resulting in a 404 on your site… what is the link?

Thanks

Reply

torea November 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM

Just noticed all the PDF links are not working. Can you repost these or point us to the original resources? Thanks!

Reply

cheeseslave November 28, 2011 at 5:41 PM

Oops sorry about that. I was in a hurry to get this post up since the deadline is the 9th.

I’ll fix it now.

Reply

cheeseslave November 28, 2011 at 5:54 PM

OK they should be working now!

Reply

George Parr November 28, 2011 at 6:07 PM

Polluted places around the world plant oysters to clean the water and these people are to be shut down for making a positive contribution?

Reply

cheeseslave November 28, 2011 at 8:36 PM

Exactly right, my good man.

Reply

permaculture feast February 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM

It is however not always possible to modify certain conditions and restrictions that
come with the property. In addition to the zoning regulations and
land use requirements some jurisdictions may also have Boards or Committees to enforce local aesthetic or historical
guidelines that were put in place to convey or preserve special
character and value to a whole City or specific neighborhood.
Healthy soil means healthy plants, which allows us to
grow organic food.

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: